Payment Of The Debt Is Against Public Policy

You must bear down on this matter.

Freedom Documents

(For Austin)

N.D.C.C. §28-26-04 rather than 28-26-01(1) is controlling since the Court finds the lease in this case constitutes “evidence of debt”. Thus, the provision in the lease providing for the payment of attorney’s fees in case of default in payment is against public policy and void. Accordingly, the Court on reconsideration declines to award James attorney’s fees in this case since an award of attorney’s fees would be a violation of N.D.C.C. §28-26-04. Copy and paste the below to the net to pull up the case.

 NOTICE OF MEMORANDUM OF LAW POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF INTERNATIONAL BILL OF EXCHANGE

Points and Authorities in Support of International Bills of Exchange or International Promissory Notes Those who constitute an association nationwide of private, unincorporated persons engaged in the business of banking to issue notes against these obligations of the United States due them; whose private property is…

View original post 6,392 more words

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s